Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maria Sara Popa vs Summer Curtis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Popa vs Curtis analysis and find out who is favored!
Maria Sara Popa vs Summer Curtis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Popa 1 - 0 Curtis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Popa has won 42.38% of points on their second serve, while Curtis has won 23.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Popa, in recent form, has won 58.31% of their opponent's second serve points, while Curtis has won 15.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.73% and 5.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Popa has saved 51.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Curtis has saved 28.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Popa has won 67.69% of matches played (W/L 44/ 21), with Curtis winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Popa has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 100/ 66), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Curtis has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Popa has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.5% of matches (W/L 27/ 13), where as Curtis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 30% of matches (W/L 3/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Popa winning 1 times and Curtis being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Popa winning 2 and Curtis winning 0. The last match between Popa and Curtis was at the W35 Santo Domingo, 12-03-2024, First, Hard with Maria Sara Popa getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Popa and Curtis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Popa winning 0 times and Curtis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Popa winning 0, and Curtis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Popa has played against opponents with an average rank of 169.08 while Curtis has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Popa has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Curtis has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Popa has converted 50.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Curtis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
424
Rank
414
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
58% (111-80)
Career Total W/L
30% (3-7)
67% (22-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maria Sara Popa | Summer Curtis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:0 | 1:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (18/31) | 54% (25/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 94% (17/18) | 56% (14/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 85% (11/13) | 24% (5/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (27/46) | 10% (3/31) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Summer Curtis
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maria Sara Popa | Summer Curtis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (22/11) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (47/26) | 0% (0/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (377/291) | 27% (9/24) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 68% (17/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.44 |
| DFs Total | 120 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.42 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1472/2076) | 54% (25/46) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (885/1472) | 56% (14/25) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (256/604) | 24% (5/21) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (164/322) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (1093/2175) | 10% (3/31) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (20/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (21/32) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 0% (2/0) |
Maria Sara Popa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Elisa Bourdeilletas
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Wakana Sonobe
Player
Maria Sara Popa
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
16 of
33)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
Player
Maria Sara Popa
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
4
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
25%
(
10 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
47 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
53 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalila Jakupovic
Player
Maria Sara Popa
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
74%
(
75 of
102)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Maria Sara Popa
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
80%
(
70 of
87)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Mara Gae
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Vanessa Georgiana Popa Teiusanu
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Maria Sara Popa
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Despina Papamichail
73%
(
84 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
81 of
128)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
58 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
67 of
128)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Verena Meliss
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Summer Curtis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Summer Curtis
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Petja Drame
Player
Summer Curtis
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
9
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Summer Curtis
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-2 10-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Popa Vs Curtis Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Popa are available here and Curtis photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
